How intuitive are you? The challenge of this contest is
to pick the sex of the author. Below you will find 3 excerpts from 3 very
different authors. Can you pick the gender of the authors.
The first entry with all 3 correct will be declared the
winner, and the prize is an personally autographed paperback copy of my soon to
be released book—“Acts Beyond
Redemption.” The first book in the ‘Unintended Consequences’ series.
Entry is simple.
Firstly
if
you are not already following my blog, please do so.
The vote will be in the comments section. Set out is
simple.
Excerpt
1. Male, Female, or Gender Fluid.
Excerpt
2. Male , Female, or Gender Fluid.
Excerpt
3. Male, Female, or Gender Fluid.
As a matter of interest please include beneath these
choices a brief outline of why you reached that conclusion. You will not be
judged on your reasons for making your choice, this is simply for interest
sake. Did you rely on purely ‘gut instinct’ perhaps? Or do you have a more
detailed reason?
I’m certain you will enjoy the excerpts, and frankly I
don’t envy you the task of choosing the gender of these authors. Have fun…and
good luck. Here we go!
EXCERPT
NUMBER 1.
My father, I regret to say, tended to drink more than
he should. He would become bold of speech, losing sense of what was appropriate
for time and place. One day he brought home a dinner guest, a priest who had
survived a mission to the Philippine Islands. I remember my brothers and I
sitting at the table, enthralled by his tales of exotic lands and people. We
failed to notice how much wine our father had had to drink until he made a
crude remark to my mother. It doesn’t matter what he said. What matters is the
effect it had on my mother, who first went the color of mortar and then the
color of an open wound. The blow of the remark, my mother’s face, and the
silence that followed made me nearly sick with fear over what would follow.
Would Father beat her, as he was wont to do? Throw things at her, as he was
wont to do? Call her a whore, as he was wont to do? And—remember!—it was all
happening in front of not a mere guest, but a priest, a servant of God whom we
were all brought up to respect through word and deed.
As I slouched over my plate in mid-chew, not knowing if
the turmoil inside me would manifest itself through nervous laughter or the
expulsion of what I’d just eaten, the priest, with no show of offense or
condemnation, recalled how, on Good Friday, some of his converts proved their
commitment to their new faith by processing through the Stations of the Cross,
each carrying his own cross. They said prayers and sang hymns, and in the end,
each man lay full length upon his cross on the ground and allowed his friends
to nail him to the wood. The crosses would then be lifted up and the crucified
left to stand for nearly an hour.
It was quite an event to describe to young boys, and
the gruesomeness of the account certainly did distract from the gruesomeness of
Father’s assault upon Mother. But if I’ve remembered the missionary’s tale all
these years, it’s not for the horror of either the tale or the dinner. It’s for
what the priest said as he ended his testimony.
The men withstood their crucifixion in silence, he
said. There were no screams, no moans, no tears, no dramatic invocations to God
to end their suffering. But there was suffering, all the same. Nails were
hammered through hands and feet. Blood flood. Bodies writhed, involuntarily,
with every blow. ‘You see the agony of others,’ the priest said, ‘and you want
it to end, yet you can do nothing to end it. All you can do is pray for them to
continue to endure with grace and courage. And as you stand there, praying,
watching, willing them to survive, you realize it’s not the person in torment
who finds courage.
And as you stand there, praying,
watching, willing them to survive, you realize it’s not the person in torment
who finds courage and comfort. It’s you yourself. The person in torment, acting
with grace and courage, has already found what you want him to have. You are
the one who is comforted, because the grace and courage of the sufferer give
you more heart and consolation than any prayer can bestow.’
EXCERPT
NUMBER 2.
Rose dropped her empty basket next to the fish boxes to
be filled, stretched her arms and gave a long, wide yawn.
“You know, sometimes,” she said to Jessie, who was
scraping some scraps of fish from the bottom of her own basket, “I think I’d
like to be workin’ in a manufactory.”
“Why?” asked Jessie.
“Oh, I’m no’ sure, really, but I’d be inside, there’d
be none of the stink of this stuff...”
“Aye, and they’d pay you pennies for workin’ all God’s
hours.”
“Well, I could be a parlor-maid then.”
Jessie laughed.
“Who’d let you into their parlor?”
“Well... a laundry maid, maybe?”
“Further down.”
“Scullery-maid?”
“That’s more like it.”
Rose smiled and pushed at Jessie’s arm, then started
back as two young boys came racing between them, jumping over their baskets and
slithering among the fish scales on the cobbles. One half-fell but was on his
feet again before the other could catch him and they ran on their screaming
way.
“Strange that we’ve had no children of or own, isn’t
it?” said Rose.
“Count your blessin’s,” replied Jessie, pointing after
the two boys. “Would you want to be havin’ that day and night, year after
year?”
There was a sadness in Rose’s eyes.
“It’d be somebody to love,” she said.
“Aye,” said Jessie, reaching over and gently pushing
her shoulder. “But think of what we have to do for it.”
“What do you mean?”
“Well, how much pleasure have you ever had out of Joe?”
Rose simply shrugged.
“No,” Jessie went on. “We lie there, or stand there –
Jimmie always took it when he wanted it – and... well, there’s just the filth
and the smell... and it’s all over.”
To her surprise, she saw tears in Rose’s eyes.
“Oh, now, come on, darlin’,” she said, moving beside
her and holding her close. “If you want bairns, there’s still plenty o’ time.”
Rose shook herself and dabbed fiercely at her eyes.
“I wouldna want a child of Joe’s,” she said.
“Doesn’t have to be,” said Jessie, leaning to whisper
in her ear. “Look at it. Men everywhere. One of them’ll oblige you. You’re a
fine-lookin’ woman.”
“And you’re disgustin’,” replied Rose.
Their intimacy was broken by Jack Dorner, one the
clerks of the trawler company they carried their loads for.
“Stopped for the day, have you?” he said, coming up
beside them.
“We’re waitin’ for the baskets to...” Jessie started.
He shook his head and raised a hand to stop her.
“We need a horse fetched down from the stables. Off you
go, Rose. Quick as you can.”
He turned and went back toward the office.
“Maybe he’d be the one,” said Jessie.
“What one?”
“You know,” said Jessie and she thrust her hips back
and forth.
Rose rubbed her hands on her rough apron to dry them.
“I’d rather have the horse,” she said.
“That’s just greedy,” said Jessie.
Rose kissed her on the cheek and set off for Union
Street.
EXCERPT
NUMBER 3.
It happened again, today, in
Morrison’s. Her shopping totalling £4.44. How did she do that? In
the hardware shop too she bought some cutlery and some tacks and nails for some
old art canvasses and it came to £9.11. It was the way the assistant said,
that’s nine-eleven please, without register, not a visible one anyway.
It happened with her father
too, the numbers. He used to speak about it. ‘No accident in
numbers, Marina,’ he’d say. ‘They have their own beauty and mystery. The
universe came into being because of mathematical precision.’
He would have known about
that. Clocks were his business – the selling and repairing of them. He loved
the intricacy behind a watch, poring and probing its cogs and wheels under a
magnifying glass, like it was a brain or heart that needed to tick again.
She spoke with him on the
morning of that fateful day. 8.9.89. As if the pattern in that
sequence wasn’t enough, he phoned her at 8 minutes past 9 in the morning from a
pay phone on London Paddington station, in the days before the ubiquitous
mobile phone. She remembered it was that time. Those numbers. He’d
phoned to report on her uncle, his brother, who was stable in hospital after a
gruelling ten-hour operation to remove a tumour from his face. ‘He wanted
to send his love to you and Dale and little Thomas.’ She doubted somehow her
uncle, her father’s brother, would have managed to speak after such an
operation but they were, to all intents and purposes, her dad’s last words
before dropping dead on the Paddington to Penzance service. Overshot his
station by a good many stops, to arrive cold and off his perch at Penzance, the
terminus. When they returned his belongings, his watch had stopped at 8
minutes past 9.
Morning or evening, nobody
knew.
The foundation stone of her
life, gone.
But he’d seen things to be
proud of – hadn’t he? – her art degree, her wedding, her child.
Or?
Did she somehow know that the
happy bells of the wedding would one day turn into a sad bell? A funeral
bell? The weather was all wrong at her wedding, wasn’t it? When it rains at a
funeral people say the weather is in sympathy with the dead, when sunny they
say it is so-and-so smiling down, when it’s sunny for a wedding they say it’s
heaven shining down on the newly-weds – but rain at a wedding? Everyone knows
that’s a bad omen, don’t they?
1. Male, because of the reference to the priest describing the event to 'young boys.' If the writer were not a boy, surely he would have said 'young children' or some such thing.. Of course, possibly the boys were much younger, but there's no suggestion of that in the opening mention of them, 'My brothers and I' and 'we failed to notice.' Equally, it could be a woman writer writing as a man, but I don't think so.
ReplyDelete2. Female. Mainly because of the subject matter and attitudes, (but this may just be very clever writing by a man, of course.)
3. Probably Female. Much harder to tell with this one. Numbers seems more like a man's interest, but the superstition attached could be female. (what sweeping generalisations! Anyone can like numbers or be superstitious, male or female! But something about the style says 'woman' to me.)
Let's see. #1 male, because of the turns of phrase. #2 female, because I can't picture a man caring enough to write that conversation between two women. #3 male, because the intricate number relationships seem more masculine to me. Of course, I am just as likely to be wrong about all three!!
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteFemale writing in male character... the word choices seemed more female; male... again word choices; female... seemed a more feminine voice
ReplyDeleteThanks to you all. The voting will continue until 4th August .
ReplyDeleteExcerpt 1 - Male - probably because of the starkness of the writing and the lack of emotion.
ReplyDeleteExcerpt 2 - Male - I think the writing is male trying to write from a female perspective.
Excerpt 3 - Female - no reason just a gut feeling.
It is very difficult to tell.
#1 I think this is female but disguising her writing to feel harsh as a man would right IMO
ReplyDelete#2 I think this is male - just gut instinct
#3 I found this one very difficult to analyse but if i had to choose I would say a 'gentle' male