Showing posts with label Violence in literature: Fiction; History of literature. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Violence in literature: Fiction; History of literature. Show all posts

Sunday, August 14, 2011

Topic: "Violence In Literature; when is Enough, Enough?" My guest today; Author, Evangeline Jennings.

My guest today is author, Evangeline Jennings.

VIOLENCE IN LITERATURE – WHEN IS ENOUGH, ENOUGH?

Evangeline Jennings

We live in violent times. We always have done. Violence is central and organic to the human story. Inhumanity is integral to our plot.

Twelve thousand years ago, our ancestors were painting battle scenes on the walls of caves in Spain. Today, we have a world wide web and twenty-four hour news. This week alone we’ve seen anarchy in the UK, massacres in Syria, Pashtun-Urdu violence in Karachi, and fresh revelations about torture camps in Zimbabwe’s diamond mines.

If you ask me – and somebody did, writing about violence is an entirely rational response to the world we live in.

Writing violence for its own sake? Not so much.

So when is enough, enough? And how much is too much? The only sensible answer is, Well, it depends.

Followed sharply by But I’ll know it when I see it.

“Was that as good for you as it was for me?”

- Mr Blonde, Reservoir Dogs

Like most adults I know, I’ve been a victim of minor violence. And like many women, I’ve also experienced sexual abuse and assault. The first time it happened I was thirteen-years old. On the unspoken sliding scale of such things, it was nothing to write home about. What’s being held down and felt up by three curious and frustrated boys compared to all the truly awful things that happen?

Lately, the awful things have inspired me to write a book called Puta, and I believe the level of violence in my work is entirely commensurate with the events I’m responding to.

In Texas, for example, in a small town only an hour’s drive from my family’s trailer park, an eleven-year old girl was gang raped on at least six different occasions at the end of last year. Up to twenty-eight men and boys may have been involved. Last time I looked, nineteen had been arrested. Mostly on the basis of souvenir cell phone movies.

Residents defending the accused have blamed the victim, suggesting she dressed inappropriately and enjoyed her starring role in all six entirely innocent gang bangs. Failing that, of course, they blame the little girl’s parents.

An hour to the east, a teenage cheerleader was kicked off her high school squad for refusing to cheer for her rapist. The highest courts in the land have supported that decision.

And this week in San Angelo, Texas, polygamist sect leader Warren Jeffs has been sentenced to life in prison for sexually assaulting two underage followers he took as “brides”. He sexually assaulted one of them pregnant.

In Europe, Josef Fritzl, Detlef S, and the Kidwelly Cult cast long and obvious shadows.

And then there’s tip-of-the-iceberg headline grabbers like Operation Delego.

In other news, Afghan women continue to set themselves on fire in protest at life in the Middle Ages, and Saudi Arabia is still the biggest women’s prison on the planet. Apparently human rights are more of a guideline when that much oil is involved.

When they’re not jailing women who choose to drive their own cars, the Saudis have also been helping “keep the peace” in Bahrain where a twenty-year old woman was arrested, imprisoned, and tortured for reading a poem in public. After she was forced to apologize on TV, Ayat al-Gormezi was sentenced to another year in prison.

Meanwhile, India has again been shown to have criminally high levels of female infanticide and a culture of sex-selective abortion tantamount to gendercide. Indian girls lucky enough to survive their mothers will find domestic violence endemic, and police unwilling to intervene except in extreme cases.

Before you start feeling too good about life in your safe European home, consider what the UK charity Refuge has to say. Every week in England and Wales, two women are killed by a current or former partner and ten more women commit suicide as a direct consequence of domestic abuse. That’s more than six hundred dead women a year. And if there are children in those homes, half of them will be abused too.

So when is enough, enough? I’ll let you know when I see it.

Enter DEMETRIUS and CHIRON with LAVINIA, ravished; her hands cut off, and her tongue cut out

- Stage Direction, Act 2, Scene 4 of Titus Andronicus

I’m not going to argue that violence in literature is a feminist issue - although obviously it is. But my lifetime of reading has taught me a general literary truth. Straight men are killed for money - everyone else is killed for fun.

So here’s where I draw my line: Münchausen misery lit, serial killer shite, and any other bad and dishonest writing that tries to turn rape and torture into money.

Violence against women and children? That’ll do nicely. A fresh perversion or a novel brutality? Sign here. Who cares if we’re dehumanizing real victims and trivializing their suffering until it becomes another tired trope?

And you, Joe Formula, don’t tell me what you’re doing is different. Don’t tell me it’s art. It isn’t, and you’re not. You’re selling cheap holidays in other people’s misery and propagating the idea that women and children are born to be victims.

The books that defined the modern serial killer era - Red Dragon and Silence Of The Lambs - were written in the eighties. Jeffrey Deaver jumped on the bandwagon long ago. Writers as fine as Michael Connelly and John Sandford and prolific as James Patterson Inc have sprayed their various scents all over the genre. It’s time you rape-torture-porn idiots realized it’s over. Let go. No one listens to techno anymore either.

Michael C Hall’s Dexter – as opposed to Jeff Lindsay’s poorly written original - is giving you bums and losers the last rites, executing serial killer stereotypes season after season. Why not see if you have the talent and creativity to summon up something new?

Dennis Cooper did. Poppy Z Brite did. And so did Bret Easton Ellis.

“I'm into, oh murders and executions mostly. It depends."

- Patrick Bateman, American Psycho

When he wrote of rats and nail guns, Ellis was - he says - both building a performance art commentary on contemporary life and being entirely gratuitous. At one and the same time. The latter claim may have been an attempt to move his art off his publisher’s page and into the news media but, either way, Patrick Bateman’s matter-of-fact brutality is entirely in keeping with his obsessively detailed point of view. Actual or imagined, they’re rich with verve and humour.

In American Psycho, way too much is just about enough. It’s a splendid read - if you don’t throw up - but guess what? It’s been done. We’ve seen the movie, we’ve got the tee shirt. And we don’t need your witless variations on the theme.

Or to put it another way, Cliffs:

If you think Titus Andronicus, Patrick Bateman, and Mr Blonde give you permission to paint your pages red with gore porn and you’re not using your First Amendment freedom to say something important or new, then you’re a fiction-fan hack at best and your writing is probably worthless and masturbatory.

We’ll know it when we see it.

~~~~~

Evangeline Jennings is an opinionated bitch who tells lies for fun and profit.

She lives a glamorous transatlantic lifestyle jetting between a disused grow-house on the Welsh island of Anglesey and a trailer park on the fringes of Houston, TX.

The topic is open for discussion. Your opinions and observations are most welcome.

Monday, August 1, 2011

Topic: "Violence in Literature, when is enough, enough?" My guest Author, Mark Stone.


Please join in the discussion with my Guest Today; Author Mark Stone
Violence in Literature: When is enough, enough?
Lions and tigers and gore, oh my!
This is a subject near and dear to my heart. Considering that my own work has enough violence to quell the bloodlust of Tarantino fans everywhere, it’s a good question and a very simple one. So let’s start this thing off with a bang (okay, pun intended).
Cast your mind back to, oh, let’s say….2500 years ago. Ancient Greece, home of the cool looking outfits called chitons and peplos. When men were men and women were tired of all the spear flinging and sword swinging. It was the time of the blind genius poet Homer and his creation of the two of the greatest literary achievements known to the Western World, The Odyssey and the Iliad. Good times had by several.
You see, those two works not only shaped the very foundation, the essence, of literature as we know it, but they were, are, two of the most blood soaked, violent, hard-core, no-nonsense books in literary history. For those of you who haven’t enjoyed them, trust me…when Homer describes a spear tearing loose a warrior’s diaphragm when pulled out, it’s a tad disconcerting and probably not suited for children under 13. Or many adults, for that matter. Is it too much, though? Is the description of blood, bone and brains splattering the landscape gratuitous? Not according to English Profs the world over. They say that those two works, admittedly filled with descriptions of brutal battles, cannibalism, and horror, have touched us even to this day.
Take Bill Shakespeare. Arguably the greatest playwright ever. Sword fights, bloodletting, betrayal, drowning, mutilation, poisoning and suicide. Wow…and that’s just in Hamlet! Hang on, it gets better…head on over to Macbeth, Julius Caesar, Romeo and Juliet and Henry V (to name but a few); talk about a cornucopia of blood and gore soaking the pages! But all that violence was carefully camouflaged behind flowery iambic pentameter that had Lit Majors the world over scratching their heads in puzzlement. I ask you, however, did old Bill go overboard with the violence, even in his romances? If so, when do we say enough? When do the pages become so slick with human-juice that we just have to put the book down so we can barf day-glo?
Here are the nuts and bolts of the matter as I see them: It is merely a matter of taste, not boilerplate judgment or law…that’s it, no shit, Kemosabbes.
Does that sound like a cop-out? Of course it does…but it’s not. Really. Consider this, if the whole world thought that stomping on frogs was an artistic endeavor, then it would be so. If people believed that bulimia was merely an expression of appreciation for a fine meal, then it would be so. It is called perceptual reality; the universe exists only because we perceive it does. Funky, huh?
Some people dig porn and, hey, who am I to judge? To some it’s art and a form of expression that enlightens and empowers. For me, not so much, but that’s my hang up. Some people find professional wrestling exciting and downright fun. Once again, for me not so much. I perceive, therefore the world is what I think it is.
At any given time we can put down the book we are reading and say, “I don’t like it.” The opinions of all those authors out there (myself included) don’t really matter, not one whit. What matters is YOU…you and what you judge to be important in your life. If the violence in the book, magazine, article…whatever…is too much, put it down and go play with your kids, or go play with yourself, hell…just go out and play. Have a good time. You are the judge of what is enough, not us scribblers.
As for me, I’m going to keep writing books so violent they make Reservoir Dogs look like Mr. Magoo.